Key Specifications

SpecificationGrok-2Llama 3.1 405B
Vendorxaimeta
Version23.1-405b
Release Date2024-08-132024-07-23
Context Window131072 tokens128000 tokens
Input Modalitiestext, imagetext
Output Modalitiestexttext
LicenseProprietaryLlama 3 Community License
SOC2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001

Benchmark Results

BenchmarkGrok-2Llama 3.1 405BWinner
BBH8482.9Grok-2
GSM8K93.289.2Grok-2
HUMANEVAL88.489Llama 3.1 405B
MATH76.873.8Grok-2
MMLU87.588.6Llama 3.1 405B

Pricing Comparison

Tier (per Mtok)Grok-2Llama 3.1 405B
Input$2$5
Output$10$15
Cache Read$0$0
Cache Write$0$0

Grok-2 karşı Llama 3.1 405B

Model Genel Bakışı

Grok-2 and Llama 3.1 405B are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.

Temel Özellikler

SatıcıYayın TarihiBağlam PenceresiLisans
Xai / Meta2024-08-13 / 2024-07-23131K / 128KProprietary / Llama 3 Community License

Benchmark Performansı

BenchmarkGrok-2Llama 3.1 405BKazanan
BBH (BIG-Bench Hard)84.082.9A
GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K)93.289.2A
HumanEval88.489.0B
MATH76.873.8A
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding)87.588.6B

Fiyat Karşılaştırması

GirişÇıkışÖnbellek OkumaÖnbellek Yazma
— / —— / —— / —— / —

milyon token başına — A / B

Güçlü Yönler & Zayıf Yönler

Grok-2

  • ✅ MMLU score 87.5, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 88.4, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 93.2, robust math reasoning.
  • ✅ 支持文本、图像、音频多模态输入。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Llama 3.1 405B

  • ✅ MMLU score 88.6, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 89.0, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 89.2, robust math reasoning.
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Editör Görüşü

Grok-2 and Llama 3.1 405B each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.

SSS

Which model is better for coding tasks?

Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.

Which model is cheaper?

Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.

Which has a longer context window?

Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.

Referanslar

Editor's Take

See Editor's Take section.