Key Specifications

SpecificationQwen2.5 72BMistral Large 2
Vendoralibabamistral
Version2.5-72blarge-2
Release Date2024-09-192024-07-24
Context Window131072 tokens128000 tokens
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext
LicenseQwen LicenseMistral Research License
SOC2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001

Benchmark Results

BenchmarkQwen2.5 72BMistral Large 2Winner
BBH82.481Qwen2.5 72B
GSM8K88.493Mistral Large 2
HUMANEVAL86.692Mistral Large 2
MATH83.171Qwen2.5 72B
MMLU86.184Qwen2.5 72B

Pricing Comparison

Tier (per Mtok)Qwen2.5 72BMistral Large 2
Input$0.5$2
Output$0.8$6
Cache Read$0$0
Cache Write$0$0

Qwen2.5 72B kontra Mistral Large 2

Przegląd modelu

Qwen2.5 72B and Mistral Large 2 are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.

Kluczowe specyfikacje

DostawcaData wydaniaOkno kontekstoweLicencja
Alibaba / Mistral2024-09-19 / 2024-07-24131K / 128KQwen License / Mistral Research License

Wydajność benchmarków

BenchmarkQwen2.5 72BMistral Large 2Zwycięzca
BBH (BIG-Bench Hard)82.481.0A
GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K)88.493.0B
HumanEval86.692.0B
MATH83.171.0A
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding)86.184.0A

Porównanie cen

WejścieWyjścieOdczyt pamięci podręcznejZapis pamięci podręcznej
— / —— / —— / —— / —

za milion tokenów — A / B

Mocne strony & Słabe strony

Qwen2.5 72B

  • ✅ MMLU score 86.1, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 86.6, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 88.4, robust math reasoning.
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Mistral Large 2

  • ✅ MMLU score 84.0, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 92.0, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 93.0, robust math reasoning.
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Opinia redakcji

Qwen2.5 72B and Mistral Large 2 each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.

FAQ

Which model is better for coding tasks?

Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.

Which model is cheaper?

Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.

Which has a longer context window?

Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.

Referencje

Editor's Take

See Editor's Take section.