Gemma 2 9B vs Gemma 7B: Benchmark Comparison
Detailed comparison of Gemma 2 9B and Gemma 7B covering benchmarks, pricing, context window, and compliance.
Key Specifications
| Specification | Gemma 2 9B | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | ||
| Version | gemma-2-9b | gemma-7b |
| Release Date | 2024-06-27 | 2024-02-21 |
| Context Window | 8192 tokens | 8192 tokens |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
| License | Gemma License | Gemma License |
| SOC2 | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | ✗ | ✗ |
| GDPR | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | ✓ |
Benchmark Results
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Gemma 7B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 90.3 | 88.4 | Gemma 2 9B |
| BBH | 66.7 | 65.7 | Gemma 2 9B |
| GPQA | 30.3 | 37.1 | Gemma 7B |
| GSM8K | 64.3 | 63.6 | Gemma 2 9B |
| HUMANEVAL | 60.9 | 61 | Gemma 7B |
| IFEVAL | 64.3 | 66.9 | Gemma 7B |
| MATH | 28.9 | 25.7 | Gemma 2 9B |
| MMLU | 64.3 | 69.6 | Gemma 7B |
| MUSR | 44.1 | 36.2 | Gemma 2 9B |
| WINOGRANDE | 72.5 | 74.1 | Gemma 7B |
Pricing Comparison
| Tier (per Mtok) | Gemma 2 9B | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $0.3 | $0.22 |
| Output | $0.3 | $0.22 |
| Cache Read | $0 | $0 |
| Cache Write | $0 | $0 |
Gemma 2 9B kontra Gemma 7B
Przegląd modelu
Gemma 2 9B and Gemma 7B are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.
Kluczowe specyfikacje
| Dostawca | Data wydania | Okno kontekstowe | Licencja |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google / Google | 2024-06-27 / 2024-02-21 | 8K / 8K | Gemma License / Gemma License |
Wydajność benchmarków
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Gemma 7B | Zwycięzca |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 90.3 | 88.4 | A |
| BBH (BIG-Bench Hard) | 66.7 | 65.7 | A |
| GPQA | 30.3 | 37.1 | B |
| GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K) | 64.3 | 63.6 | A |
| HumanEval | 60.9 | 61.0 | Tie |
| IFEval | 64.3 | 66.9 | B |
| MATH | 28.9 | 25.7 | A |
| MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) | 64.3 | 69.6 | B |
| MUSR | 44.1 | 36.2 | A |
| WinoGrande | 72.5 | 74.1 | B |
Porównanie cen
| Wejście | Wyjście | Odczyt pamięci podręcznej | Zapis pamięci podręcznej |
|---|---|---|---|
| — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
za milion tokenów — A / B
Mocne strony & Słabe strony
Gemma 2 9B
- ✅ 可靠的通用模型。
- ⚠️ 闭源专有模型，不支持自托管。
- ⚠️ 上下文窗口 8K 偏小。
Gemma 7B
- ✅ 可靠的通用模型。
- ⚠️ 闭源专有模型，不支持自托管。
- ⚠️ 上下文窗口 8K 偏小。
Opinia redakcji
Gemma 2 9B and Gemma 7B each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.
FAQ
Which model is better for coding tasks?
Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.
Which model is cheaper?
Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.
Which has a longer context window?
Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.
Referencje
Editor's Take
See Editor's Take section.